| |
Televised Impeachment Hearings Begin 11/13 06:19
The closed doors of the Trump impeachment investigation are swinging wide
open.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The closed doors of the Trump impeachment investigation
are swinging wide open.
When the gavel strikes at the start of the House hearing on Wednesday
morning, America and the rest of the world will have the chance to see and hear
for themselves for the first time about President Donald Trump's actions toward
Ukraine and consider whether they are, in fact, impeachable offenses.
It's a remarkable moment, even for a White House full of them.
All on TV, committee leaders will set the stage, then comes the main
feature: Two seasoned diplomats, William Taylor, the graying former infantry
officer now charge d'affaires in Ukraine, and George Kent, the deputy assistant
secretary in Washington, telling the striking, if sometimes complicated story
of a president allegedly using foreign policy for personal and political gain
ahead of the 2020 election.
So far, the narrative is splitting Americans, mostly along the same lines as
Trump's unusual presidency. The Constitution sets a dramatic, but vague, bar
for impeachment, and there's no consensus yet that Trump's actions at the heart
of the inquiry meet the threshold of "high crimes and misdemeanors."
Whether Wednesday's proceedings begin to end a presidency or help secure
Trump's position, it's certain that his chaotic term has finally arrived at a
place he cannot control and a force, the constitutional system of checks and
balances, that he cannot ignore.
The country has been here just three times before, and never against the
backdrop of social media and real-time commentary, including from the
Republican president himself.
"These hearings will address subjects of profound consequence for the Nation
and the functioning of our government under the Constitution," said Democratic
Rep. Adam Schiff of California, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee
leading the inquiry, in a memo to lawmakers.
Schiff called it a "solemn undertaking," and counseled colleagues to
"approach these proceedings with the seriousness of purpose and love of country
that they demand."
"Total impeachment scam," tweeted the president, as he does virtually every
day.
Impeachments are rare, historians say, because they amount to nothing short
of the nullification of an election. Starting down this road poses risks for
both Democrats and Republicans as proceedings push into the 2020 campaign.
Unlike the Watergate hearings and Richard Nixon, there is not yet a "cancer
on the presidency" moment galvanizing public opinion. Nor is there the national
shrug, as happened when Bill Clinton's impeachment ultimately didn't result in
his removal from office. It's perhaps most like the partisanship-infused
impeachment of Andrew Johnson after the Civil War.
Trump calls the whole thing a "witch hunt," a retort that echoes Nixon's own
defense. Republicans say Democrats have been trying to get rid of this
president since he took office, starting with former special counsel Robert
Mueller's investigation into Russian interference to help Trump in the 2016
election.
Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was initially reluctant to launch a
formal impeachment inquiry. As Democrats took control of the House in January,
Pelosi said impeachment would be "too divisive" for the country. Trump, she
said, was simply "not worth it."
After Mueller's appearance on Capitol Hill in July for the end of the Russia
probe, the door to impeachment proceedings seemed closed.
But the next day Trump got on the phone.
For the past month, witness after witness has testified under oath about his
July 25 phone call with Ukraine's newly elected president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy,
and the alarms it set off in U.S. diplomatic and national security circles.
In a secure room in the Capitol basement, current and former officials have
been telling lawmakers what they know. They've said an earlier Trump call in
April congratulating Zelenskiy on his election victory seemed fine. The former
U.S. reality TV host and the young Ukrainian comedian hit it off.
But in the July call, things turned.
An anonymous whistleblower first alerted officials to the phone call. "I
have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials that the
President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit
interference from a foreign country in the 2020 election," the person wrote in
August to the House and Senate Intelligence committees. Democrats fought for
the letter to be released to them as required.
"I am deeply concerned," the whistleblower wrote.
Trump insisted the call was "perfect." The White House released a rough
transcript. Pelosi, given the nod from her most centrist freshman lawmakers,
opened the inquiry.
"The president has his opportunity to prove his innocence," she told
Noticias Telemundo on Tuesday.
Defying White House orders not to appear, witnesses have testified that
Trump's acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, was withholding U.S. military aid
to the budding democracy until the new Ukraine government conducted
investigations Trump wanted into Democrats in the 2016 election and his
potential 2020 rival, Joe Biden, and his son, Hunter.
It was all part of what Taylor, the long-serving top diplomat in Ukraine,
called the "irregular" foreign policy being led by Trump's personal attorney,
Rudy Giuliani, outside of traditional channels.
Taylor said it was "crazy" that the Trump administration was withholding
U.S. military assistance to the East European ally over the political
investigations, with Russian forces on Ukraine's border on watch for a moment
of weakness.
Kent, the bowtie-wearing State Department official, told investigators there
were three things Trump wanted of Ukraine: "Investigations, Biden, Clinton."
On Friday, the public is scheduled to hear from Marie Yovanovitch, the
former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, who told investigators she was warned to
"watch my back" as Trump undercut and then recalled her.
Eight more witnesses will testify in public hearings next week.
"What this affords is the opportunity for the cream of our diplomatic corps
to tell the American people a clear and consistent story of what the president
did," said Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., a member of the Intelligence panel.
"It takes a lot of courage to do what they are doing," he said, "and they
are probably just going to be abused for it."
Republicans, led on the panel by Rep. Devin Nunes, a longtime Trump ally
from California, will argue that none of those witnesses has first-hand
knowledge of the president's actions. They will say Ukraine never felt
pressured and the aid money eventually flowed, in September.
Yet Republicans are struggling to form a unified defense of Trump. Instead
they often fall back on criticism of the process.
Some Republicans align with Trump's view, which is outside of mainstream
intelligence findings, that Ukraine was involved in 2016 U.S. election
interference. They want to hear from Hunter Biden, who served on the board of a
gas company in Ukraine, Burisma, while his father was the vice president. And
they are trying to bring forward the still-anonymous whistleblower, whose
identity Democrats have vowed to protect.
The framers of the Constitution provided few details about how the
impeachment proceedings should be run, leaving much for Congress to decide.
Democrats say the White House's refusal to provide witnesses or produce
documents is obstruction and itself impeachable.
Hearings are expected to continue and will shift, likely by Thanksgiving, to
the Judiciary Committee to consider actual articles of impeachment.
The House, which is controlled by Democrats, is expected to vote by
Christmas.
That would launch a trial in the Senate, where Republicans have the
majority, in the new year.
(KR)
|
|
